Case 6004721/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Grzegorzewicz v FJ Poole Ltd T/A Lis Chinese — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004721/2024
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Grzegorzewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rayner sitting at Southampton on 27 and 28 May 2025 determined the claimant's employment status as a worker within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, finding he was neither an employee nor a self-employed contractor. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and his breach of contract claim, finding neither was well-founded.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay complaint, finding the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's engagement ended, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,176.82. The tribunal also found that at the commencement of proceedings the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars, with no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable.
Applying section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal considered it just and equitable to award an amount equal to four weeks' gross pay, namely £600.00. The total sum payable to the claimant by the respondent is £1,776.88, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday accrued but not taken at the end of the claimant's engagement; treated as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,177 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 38 Employment Act 2002; tribunal made an award equal to four weeks' gross pay. No locked §4.4 enum directly matches this statutory claim, so classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,777
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.