Case 6004723/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Ali v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004723/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms JA Beards, Mr N Pearse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints concerning religious discrimination against Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Her complaints of direct discrimination because of religion were dismissed following withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the indirect religious discrimination complaint concerning allocation of shifts had been brought outside the applicable time limits. It did not consider it just and equitable to extend time, so the claim was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The claimant's complaint of indirect religious discrimination concerning allocation of holiday failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination because of religion were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Indirect religious discrimination in respect of allocation of shifts was brought outside the applicable time limits; the tribunal did not consider it just and equitable to extend time and struck out the claim for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Indirect religious discrimination in respect of allocation of holiday failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.