Case 6004778/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Lauren Lymer v Enchanted Care and Housekeeping services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004778/2025
- Decision date
- 23 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lauren Lymer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Lauren Lymer's claim against Enchanted Care and Housekeeping services Ltd. On 3 September 2025, it wrote to the claimant warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 15 April 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal's letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing for that purpose. The claimant did not reply, and the claim was therefore struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to "the claim"; classification follows the Layer 1 listing category and claim-type hint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.