Case 6004857/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. J. McKenzie Respondent Acculabs Diagnostics UK Ltd v Mr. Pal (consultant) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004857/2024
- Decision date
- 26 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. J. McKenzie Respondent Acculabs Diagnostics UK Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal because it was not presented within the applicable time limit. The judgment records that it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented in time.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of disability discrimination because it was not presented within the applicable time limit. The judgment records that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.