Case 6004869/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Bireescu v Beer Hopper Company Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6004869/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle upon Tyne on 11 December 2024 before Employment Judge Heather, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mrs S Hopper, Director. The only judgment recorded was on redundancy payment.
The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that Mr V Bireescu was entitled to a redundancy payment. The amount awarded was £1,879.50.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No further written reasons were provided in the decision extract, so no additional factual findings or disputed issues are recorded here beyond the entitlement and amount of the redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,879.50. | Upheld | — | £1,880 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,880
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.