Case 6004893/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Represented herself For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004893/2024
- Decision date
- 26 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Represented herself For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented the case on 1 July 2024 against London Tara Hotel Limited t/a Copthorne Tara Hotel. The claim form referred to unfair dismissal and failure to pay notice pay. At the preliminary hearing, the judge accepted the claimant's stated employment dates for the purpose of the hearing, namely 7 October 2022 to 10 December 2022, but held that in any event she did not have the 2 years' continuous service needed to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service; the judge also said it would have been dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed because it was presented outside the time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 years’ continuous service
- rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- COT 3 settlement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.