Case 6004994/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Boucher v Tanyard Youth Project Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004994/2025
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Boucher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent issued by Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone at Cardiff (by CVP) on 23 January 2026. The Claimant, Mr W Boucher, appeared in person; the Respondent, Tanyard Youth Project Ltd, was represented by Mr S Watts (Project Manager).
The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay and unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded. The Respondent agreed to pay £9,000 gross in respect of this claim, and the Claimant agreed to accept it. The judgment notes the Claimant is responsible for any tax or statutory deductions due on the award.
The available judgment text addresses only the holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages elements. Other matters referenced in the gov.uk listing (contract of employment, unfair dismissal, working time / written statements) are not adjudicated in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent. Claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay declared well-founded; combined with the unlawful deduction from wages claim under a single agreed sum of £9,000 gross, not split per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent. Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages declared well-founded; combined with the holiday pay claim under a single agreed sum of £9,000 gross, not split per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Listed on gov.uk under Contract of Employment but the judgment text does not separately adjudicate a breach of contract claim. Outcome unclear from the available text. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Listed on gov.uk under Unfair Dismissal but the judgment text (a consent judgment on holiday pay and unlawful deductions) does not address an unfair dismissal claim. Outcome unclear from the available text. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Listed on gov.uk under Working Time Regulations and Written Statements but the judgment text does not separately adjudicate a working time or written statement claim distinct from the holiday pay element. Outcome unclear from the available text. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.