Case 6005006/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Green v DM2 Property Transformations Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005006/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Harrington, sitting alone at London South by CVP on 29 May 2025, heard complaints by Mr S Green against DM2 Property Transformations Limited concerning holiday pay and unpaid wages. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Ms D Sowerby, HR Consultant.
The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded, concluding that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken on the date employment ended. The respondent was ordered to pay £353.29, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The tribunal also found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded in respect of the period 1 February 2024 to 3 May 2024, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,222.99, comprising £115.36 for hours worked on 1 February 2024 and £1,107.63 for additional hours worked. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the document.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded; respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken on termination. Treated by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £353 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions for the period 1 February 2024 – 3 May 2024; comprises £115.36 for hours worked on 1 February 2024 and £1,107.63 for additional hours worked. | Upheld | — | £1,223 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,576
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.