Case 6005031/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Leslie Chapman v Advance Solutions UPS Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005031/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Richardson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leslie Chapman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Leslie Chapman, and the respondent, Advance Solutions UPS Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation), did not attend the hearing on 24 November 2025 before Employment Judge K Richardson. The judgment records that the complaints were dealt with at Southampton and that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
The tribunal struck out the complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made, and the written record does not record any award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.