Case 6005033/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Muxworthy v Ascend Airways Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005033/2024
- Decision date
- 13 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Muxworthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 13 November 2024 before Employment Judge Isaacson, the tribunal dealt with Mr S Muxworthy's complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal against Ascend Airways Limited. The claimant was not present and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the ordinary unfair dismissal complaint under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The reason given was that the claimant did not have two years' continuous service.
No monetary remedy was awarded, and the judgment records only the strike-out disposal of the unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal stated that the claimant did not have two years' continuous service. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.