Case 6005078/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M S Saatci v UY & GA Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005078/2025
- Decision date
- 24 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
- Venue
- London South Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M S Saatci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Mclaren heard the case by CVP on 29 September 2025 at London South Hearing Centre. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 7 October to 24 November 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay £10,105.34 as the gross sum deducted plus £150 in expenses reimbursement.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded £9,166.66 in damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect that the claimant is likely to have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. A further breach of contract complaint concerning failure to follow the disciplinary policy was found not well-founded and did not succeed.
The complaint relating to holiday pay was also upheld, the tribunal finding that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay holidays accrued but not taken on the date employment ended, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,706.54. Written reasons were not provided as none were requested at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages 7 October to 24 November 2024: £10,105.34 gross wages plus £150 expenses reimbursement. | Upheld | — | £10,255 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay; £9,166.66 awarded as damages calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax liability on post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £9,167 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to failure to follow disciplinary policy; tribunal found it not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holidays accrued but not taken on the date employment ended; characterised by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,707 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,128
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.