Case 6005111/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nagar v Masala Bowl (SVR Enterprises LTD) (in compulsory liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005111/2026
- Decision date
- 26 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Nagar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Nagar's complaint that he was unfairly dismissed by Masala Bowl (SVR Enterprises LTD) (in compulsory liquidation) was struck out. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint and that Mr Nagar had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
The tribunal found that Mr Nagar was therefore not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint and had not provided an acceptable reason, despite being given an opportunity to do so, why it should not be struck out. His other complaints were not affected by the judgment. No remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment and were not identified or adjudicated in the supplied judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.