Case 6005161/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dobrin Ghilase v Hirsch Properties Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005161/2024
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dobrin Ghilase
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khan, sitting alone at London Central by CVP on 23 June 2025, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found that Dobrin Ghilase had not been employed by Hirsch Properties Limited for two continuous years, so the qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal was not met.
The remaining claim of race discrimination was dismissed under rule 38(1)(b). The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of that claim in the extracted text provided, and no compensatory or other monetary award was made.
No remedy was awarded on either claim. The judgment was sent to the parties on 30 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant was not employed by the respondent for two continuous years. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The remaining race discrimination claim was dismissed under rule 38(1)(b). | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.