Case 6005206/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Rea Parker v Jacksons Sports Bar — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005206/2025
- Decision date
- 14 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rea Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Rea Parker's claim against Jacksons Sports Bar. The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action.
The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 12 March 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant had not responded to the Tribunal's letter dated 12 September 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply.
Employment Judge Spencer was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3 because the claim could not be fairly and justly determined without the claimant's engagement. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim without identifying the underlying cause or causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.