Case 6005225/2025 · Employment Tribunal
L Price v Greens Dry Cleaners Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005225/2025
- Decision date
- 4 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ASPINALL Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that the respondent accepted liability and agreed the amounts to be awarded. No contested findings of fact were made by the tribunal.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £14,175, comprising a statutory redundancy payment of £9,315 (calculated on the basis of 16 years' service, age 55 at the effective date of termination, at £405 per week) and statutory notice pay of £4,860 (12 weeks' maximum statutory notice at £405 per week). The hearing listed for 1 July 2025 was cancelled.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Aspinall on 28 May 2025 and sent to the parties on 4 June 2025. A standard notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, setting the relevant decision day as 4 June 2025, the calculation day as 5 June 2025, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment based on 16 years' service, age 55 at effective date of termination, at £405 per week. | Upheld | — | £9,315 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Statutory notice pay: 12 weeks maximum statutory notice at £405 per week. The judgment does not specify the legal heading under which notice pay was awarded; classified as unlawful_deduction_wages as the closest fit among the locked enum for unpaid statutory notice. | Upheld | — | £4,860 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,175
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.