Case 6005274/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Young v The Spellow (PP) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005274/2024
- Decision date
- 12 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant A Young's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against The Spellow (PP) Ltd. It found the complaint well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £864, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted.
The judgment does not identify any other claim, and it does not record a split of the award into separate heads beyond the gross amount deducted. It states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that payment. A separate notice on interest records the relevant decision day as 11 April 2025 and explains that statutory interest may apply if the sum is not paid within 14 days, but no quantified interest figure is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum deducted, £864. The claimant was stated to be responsible for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £864 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £864
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.