Case 6005317/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Schwartz v Curzon Mayfair Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005317/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Schwartz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Baty, sitting alone at London Central on 3 June 2025, heard the claimant's complaints. The claimant represented herself; the respondent, which is in voluntary liquidation, did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints for a statutory redundancy payment, unpaid notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay, and made an award totalling £16,192.28 payable by the respondent to the claimant.
The award comprised £3,500 as a statutory redundancy payment, £7,500 for 2 months' notice pay, and £5,192.28 for 6 weeks' accrued but untaken holiday pay. The notice pay and holiday pay components were stated to be subject to deduction of any tax or national insurance payable.
The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and of pregnancy/maternity discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay (2 months), subject to deduction of any tax or national insurance payable. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
| Holiday pay | 6 weeks' accrued but untaken holiday pay (£5,192.28), subject to deduction of any tax or national insurance payable. Amount rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £5,192 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.