Case 6005332/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Brown v Aurem Care (Brimington) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005332/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Siddique
- Venue
- Nottingham via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Brown brought a claim against Aurem Care (Brimington) Limited which, on the face of the judgment and the GOV.UK listing, was an unfair dismissal complaint. At the hearing on 19 June 2025 before Employment Judge M. Siddique, the Tribunal recorded that the claim had been presented outside the statutory time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On that basis, the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim and dismissed it. The judgment records no findings on the substantive merits of the dismissal complaint and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that the Claimant presented the complaint outside the statutory time limit in section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.