Case 6005365/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Denning v Sarah Gibbon — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005365/2024
- Decision date
- 8 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Denning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 08 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could be decided without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £316.26 gross. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £185.90.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £502.16 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £316.26 gross. Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £316 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £185.90. Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £186 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £502
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.