Case 6005382/2025 · Employment Tribunal
N Makinson v Greenwich International Education Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005382/2025
- Decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Makinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 18 February 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge KM Ross decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Greenwich International Education Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a net sum of £2,428.69. No separate breakdown of remedy was given between heads of claim, and no additional substantive findings were recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment also includes the standard interest notice. It states that the relevant decision day was 4 July 2025, the calculation day was 5 July 2025, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum. The extracted judgment does not specify any separate interest amount in the award itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of a net sum of £2,428.69. | Upheld | — | £2,429 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,429
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.