Case 6005400/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Calvert v Harmony Health & Beauty (South West) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005400/2024
- Decision date
- 22 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Calvert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 9 July 2024 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis of the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that Mrs K Calvert had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £333.57, expressly stating that it had taken into account the claimant’s mitigation of loss.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,314.80. The total payable under the judgment was £6,648.37.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £333.57 after taking account of mitigation of loss. | Upheld | — | £334 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £6,314.80. | Upheld | — | £6,315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,648
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.