Case 6005415/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Sedive Kisashi v Purple Panda Services Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005415/2024
- Decision date
- 31 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Sedive Kisashi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Benson heard the case at Liverpool on 10 January 2025. The claimant did not attend, and neither did the respondents. The judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service and did not respond to the Tribunal's strike out warning dated 4 November 2024.
The remaining claims were race discrimination and religion and belief discrimination. Those claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant failed to attend the listed hearing. The Tribunal recorded that a notice of hearing had been sent to the parties on 31 July 2024 and that the joining instructions for the hearing were sent to the claimant's email address the day before the hearing.
The Tribunal also noted that enquiries were made on the morning of the hearing to understand whether there was a reason for the claimant's non-attendance, but there was no answer on the telephone number provided. The judgment was sent to the parties on 15 January 2025. The record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service and failed to respond to the Tribunal's strike out warning dated 4 November 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 following the claimant's failure to attend the hearing on 10 January 2025. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 following the claimant's failure to attend the hearing on 10 January 2025. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.