Case 6005466/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Mr E Moore v Chatloop Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 6005466/2025
Decision date: 2 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 16 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr E Moore

Respondent

Chatloop Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent did not present a valid response in time, so Employment Judge Phil Allen determined the claims under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024. The judge found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of GBP 12,224.89, comprising unpaid wages for January and February 2025 of GBP 10,312.50 and unpaid commission of GBP 1,912.30.

The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also well-founded: the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's annual leave accrued but not taken on the date employment ended, and was ordered to pay the gross sum of GBP 1,730.76. The total sum payable by the respondent under the judgment is GBP 13,955.65, and the hearing listed for 23 June 2025 was cancelled. A notice under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, identifying 2 June 2025 as the relevant decision day, 3 June 2025 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate of interest.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Comprises unpaid wages for January and February 2025 (GBP 10,312.50) and unpaid commission (GBP 1,912.30); gross sum of GBP 12,224.89 ordered.	Upheld	—	£12,225
Holiday pay	Accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; gross sum of GBP 1,730.76 ordered.	Upheld	—	£1,731

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £13,956; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.