Case 6005474/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Susmitha Harish v Umair Mohammed Shafiq T/A Cupp Bubble Tea — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005474/2025
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Susmitha Harish
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to present an ET3 response to the claim, and the tribunal proceeded to judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Claimant's claim for unpaid wages covering the period August 2024 to October 2025 was found to be well founded.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a gross total sum of £1,776.82 in respect of her successful claim. The judgment notes that, although expressed as gross, account will need to be made for the relevant tax and national insurance deductions. The hearing listed for 15 July 2025 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages between August 2024 and October 2025 found well founded. Respondent failed to present an ET3 response; judgment issued under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,777 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,777
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.