Case 6005534/2025 · Employment Tribunal
E Reeves v Boxpark Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005534/2025
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Reeves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 June 2025, the tribunal gave E Reeves an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not responded to the tribunal letter of 3 June 2025 or to the strike out warning letter of 8 July 2025, and that the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Buzzard therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s) or record any monetary award; it was approved on 19 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 28 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive pleaded claim type(s); it records only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letters of 3 June 2025 and 8 July 2025, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.