Case 6005537/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Macarthur v TSP Realisations Limited (formerly known as TSP Engineering Limited) (in administration) HELD AT: Manchester Employment Tribunal (by Cloud Video Platform) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005537/2024
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ficklin, sitting at Manchester by CVP with counsel for the claimant and no appearance for the respondent (which was in administration but had been permitted by the administrator to proceed), found that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and for breach of contract in respect of lost pension both succeeded.
The claimant was awarded £5,802.05 in unpaid wages and £348.12 for breach of contract, giving a total of £6,150.17. A statutory notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, with the relevant decision day given as 10 March 2026.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £5,802 |
| Breach of contract | Lost pension. | Upheld | — | £348 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,150
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.