Case 6005563/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Khurshid v Cubic Transportation Systems Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005563/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Khurshid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr U Khurshid brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Cubic Transportation Systems Limited. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 26 and 27 November 2024 before Employment Judge Isaacson, with the claimant appearing in person and assisted by his brother and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal’s judgment was that the complaint of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written record.
No monetary award was recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy figure was identified for the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded only that the complaint of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. The written record does not set out the oral reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.