Case 6005605/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Sole-Potter v The Range Home and Leisure Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005605/2025
- Decision date
- 7 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Sole-Potter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Self struck out the claim on 7 January 2026 under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal had first written to the claimant warning that strike out was being considered and giving her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not reply. The judge was satisfied that the Rule 38 ground for strike out applied and that strike out was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment therefore records no merits finding and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons do not separate the strike-out by claim head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons do not separate the strike-out by claim head. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.