Case 6005611/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms E Mayhew-Hills, Litigation Consultant Interpreter in the Greek language: Ms M Kiose — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005611/2024
- Decision date
- 20 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brown, sitting alone at London Central on 11 November 2024, found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages in the sum of £855 gross. The judgment records that the Respondent must pay the Claimant the net equivalent of that figure, after making the appropriate deductions for tax.
The Claimant’s complaints of unpaid holiday pay and breach of contract were dismissed on withdrawal. No separate award is recorded for those complaints, and the judgment does not set out any additional remedy beyond the wage deduction sum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £855 gross and ordered payment of the net equivalent after appropriate deductions for tax. | Upheld | — | £855 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £855
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.