Case 6005631/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rankine v Welland Valley Removals Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005631/2025
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rankine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 June 2025, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 27 February 2025 and that the response had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the response. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
The final hearing remained listed for 19 June 2025. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim on the merits. It strikes out the respondent's response for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the response. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.