Case 6005662/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Michael Wellington v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005662/2024
- Decision date
- 6 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Appearances For
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michael Wellington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the respondent's applications for strike out in private by CVP on 28 January 2025. The judgment records appearances for both parties and was issued by Tribunal Judge McGrade acting as an Employment Judge.
The respondent's application for strike out in respect of the unfair dismissal claim was refused. The respondent's application for strike out in respect of the disability discrimination claims was also refused. The judgment does not give reasons, determine the merits of the claims, or address remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only refused the respondent's application for strike out of the unfair dismissal claim; it did not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only refused the respondent's application for strike out of the disability discrimination claims; it did not determine the merits of the claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.