Case 6005665/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Simone Saint v Badas Consultancy Ltd t/a COFX — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005665/2024
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Simone Saint
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Corrigan on 12 September 2024 (sent to the parties on 14 January 2025). The respondent had failed to present a valid response by the deadline of 12 August 2024, and the Employment Judge determined the claim could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent's name was changed to Badas Consultancy Ltd t/a COFX based on the ACAS Certificate and box 8.2 of the claim form, with Tunca Badas identified as sole director at the same Companies House address; no re-service was required.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,047.76 gross, subject to appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance. The claimant had requested £9 per hour for 179 hours (£1,611) but made clear this figure was net of tax. The tribunal observed that awards for unlawful deduction of wages must be made gross, and having considered the likely tax and National Insurance at the current Minimum Wage rate for the hours worked, it concluded it was unnecessary to request the claimant's gross pay. The claimant retained the ability to seek reconsideration if she disagreed with either the gross pay rate or the respondent name change. The hearing listed for 24 September 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment following the respondent's failure to present a valid response by 12 August 2024. Award is £2,047.76 gross, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. The claimant had requested £9 per hour for 179 hours (£1,611) net; the tribunal noted awards must be made gross. | Upheld | — | £2,048 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,048
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.