Case 6005700/2025 · Employment Tribunal
T Rennie v Ronnan Corporation (Eco) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005700/2025
- Decision date
- 25 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Rennie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ronnan Corporation (ECO) Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from T Rennie's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,750.00 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached its duty to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars. Because there were no particulars whatsoever, the award was increased by the higher amount and the respondent was ordered to pay a further £3,461.52, stated to be four weeks' pay at £865.38 per week.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Phil Allen on 9 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 25 June 2025. The hearing listed for 26 June 2025 was cancelled. The attached interest notice stated that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at 8% per annum from 26 June 2025 if the award was not paid within 14 days, but no separate interest amount was assessed in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,750.00. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent breached its duty to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars and increased the award by £3,461.52, described as four weeks' pay at £865.38 per week, in the absence of any particulars whatsoever. | Upheld | — | £3,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,212
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.