Case 6005746/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Mwarowa v Exceed Contracting Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005746/2024
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Mwarowa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed both claims brought by Mrs M Mwarowa against Exceed Contracting Limited. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found not well founded, and the complaint of breach of contract concerning reimbursement of business mileage expenses was also found not well founded.
The case was heard at Manchester by video on 6 January 2025 before Employment Judge Slater, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr B Mellor. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded this as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and found it not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint concerned reimbursement of business mileage expenses and was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.