Case 6005747/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Lynas v Martin Childs Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005747/2024
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Magee REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Lynas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Norwich by CVP before Employment Judge Magee on 27 and 28 November 2025, gave judgment in the claims brought by Mr B Lynas against Martin Childs Limited. The claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. The claim for unlawful deductions from wages was, by consent, found to be well founded and to succeed. The claim for unfair dismissal was also found to be well founded and to succeed.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £11,606.60, comprising £2,749.00 for unlawful deductions from wages and £8,857.60 for unfair dismissal. Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard timescale.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Well founded and succeeds by consent. | Upheld | — | £2,749 |
| Unfair dismissal | Well founded and succeeds. Award stated as £8,857.60. | Upheld | — | £8,858 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,607
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.