Case 6005806/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eric Andres Altamirano v Kingsdale Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005806/2025
- Decision date
- 6 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eric Andres Altamirano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr Eric Andres Altamirano's claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure after he failed to attend the case management preliminary hearing on 20 April 2026. The judgment does not identify the legal cause of action underlying the claim.
Notice of the remote hearing had been sent to the parties on 28 September 2025, and the CVP joining details were sent on 17 April 2026. On 18 April 2026, the claimant notified the Tribunal that he would not be able to attend, referring to his being abroad, restricted access to a computer or private area, mobile telephone signal problems, the time difference, a personal appointment and the time taken to list the preliminary hearing. Employment Judge Alliott did not accept that the claimant could not have arranged to attend remotely and found that he had not provided a satisfactory explanation for his absence. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers only to "the claim" and does not identify its legal cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.