Case 6005851/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Steven Stanek First v Proud Group Ltd Second Respondent: Alex Proud — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005851/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millns Representations
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Steven Stanek First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central by video before Employment Judge Millns on 25 September 2024, considered claims brought by Mr Steven Stanek against Proud Group Ltd (First Respondent) and Alex Proud (Second Respondent). The claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, and the breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay was likewise dismissed upon withdrawal.
In respect of the First Respondent, the tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded. The First Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £4,166.00 gross for June 2024 salary, £576.93 gross for accrued and unpaid holiday pay, £128.20 gross for March 2024 salary, and £1,346.17 gross for July 2024 salary.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 30 September 2024. The written reasons set out in the PDF do not record any legal tests by name, nor any lay panel members sitting with the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the First Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. Award comprises £4,166.00 (June 2024 salary), £576.93 (accrued and unpaid holiday pay), £128.20 (March 2024 salary), £1,346.17 (July 2024 salary), all gross. Sum rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £6,217 |
| Other | The claim against the Second Respondent (Alex Proud) was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,217
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.