Case 6005878/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Russell v Trident Maintenance Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005878/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Morton, sitting at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 3 December 2024, found that the Claimant's claims of breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages were well founded in part. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to reimburse £494.70 that had been unlawfully deducted from the Claimant's wages and £3,705.92 in expenses incurred by the Claimant in the course of his employment, giving a total payable of £4,200.62.
The Claimant's application to amend his claim to add a claim for unpaid holiday pay was refused. The Tribunal held that the claim was out of time, and that it would have been reasonably practicable for him to present it within the statutory time limit.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not to be provided unless requested. The judgment text available does not set out further factual findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claim well founded in part; £494.70 ordered as reimbursement of unlawfully deducted wages. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the claim well founded in part; £3,705.92 ordered as reimbursement of expenses incurred in the course of employment. | Upheld | — | £3,706 |
| Unfair dismissal | Listing categories included unfair dismissal, but the judgment text provided does not adjudicate an unfair dismissal claim. Outcome unclear from the available text; confidence reduced. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claimant's application to amend to add a claim for unpaid holiday pay was refused as out of time; the claim itself was not adjudicated on the merits. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,201
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.