Case 6005920/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Rose (Trade Union Official) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 6005920/2024
- Decision date
- 14 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Rose (Trade Union Official) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard as a preliminary hearing at Bury St Edmunds before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone on 9 October 2024. The judgment records that the Claimant's claim was presented outside the time limit in section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable to present a claim in time.
On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers to the Claimant's claim in the singular and cites section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; it is treated here as an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.