Case 6005978/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Harriet Mullock v Transport Investigations Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005978/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Harriet Mullock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Harriet Mullock’s complaint of unfair dismissal against Transport Investigations Limited was struck out. The tribunal recorded that she had been employed by the respondent for less than two years and that, subject to certain exceptions, section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years’ service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that Miss Mullock was not entitled to bring the complaint and had not provided an acceptable reason, despite being given an opportunity to do so, why it should not be struck out. No remedy was awarded. The judgment expressly stated that her other complaints were not affected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years’ service and did not provide an acceptable reason why it should not be struck out. The claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 two-year service requirement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.