Case 6005990/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Johnstone v Quantum Staffing Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6005990/2024
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Johnstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the material before the tribunal, the claimant succeeded on the wages claim: the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages covering the period 1 May 2024 to 7 June 2024, treated as five weeks, and calculated the net sum due by reference to net monthly pay of £2,500 and a weekly figure of £576.92.
The tribunal also found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It made an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 assessed at four weeks' gross pay, based on a gross annual salary of £43,000 but capped at £700 per week, giving an award of £2,800, stated to be non-taxable.
The claimant further succeeded on the breach of contract claim arising from dismissal in respect of notice. The tribunal awarded net damages of £1,730.76, described as statutory notice pay of one week's net pay plus the agreed additional payment for two weeks' net pay for gardening leave. The unfair dismissal claim did not succeed because, on the claim form and the claimant's written representations, the tribunal was not persuaded that she had the required two years' qualifying service, so no award was made on that claim. The total sum ordered was £7,415.36.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for unpaid wages from 1 May 2024 to 7 June 2024, calculated as five weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
| Other | The respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and the tribunal made an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 assessed at four weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract as to notice and awarded damages for one week's net notice pay plus the agreed additional payment for two weeks' net pay in respect of gardening leave. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Unfair dismissal | No award was made because the claimant did not persuade the tribunal that she had the necessary two years' qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,415
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.