Case 6006010/2024 · Employment Tribunal
S Chambers v EEK Graphics Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006010/2024
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Chambers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to EEK Graphics Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and considered a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. Employment Judge KM Ross found the complaint well-founded, holding that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages during March and April 2024.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,200, representing the net amount deducted. The judgment did not break the award down into separate components and made no findings beyond the unauthorised deductions claim. A standard Article 12 interest notice was attached, identifying 30 January 2026 as the relevant decision day and an 8% per annum stipulated rate, with interest accruing from 31 January 2026 if unpaid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period March and April 2024; respondent ordered to pay £1,200 net. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.