Case 6006031/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms V Okito v Jackson and Co Designs Limited Heard at London South by video — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006031/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms V Okito
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Corrigan, sitting alone at London South by video on 5 March 2025, considered Ms V Okito's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages against Jackson and Co Designs Limited. The claimant appeared in person, accompanied by her brother Mr Yannick Buditu; the respondent did not appear and had not entered a response.
The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,461.54, subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance. This sum represents wages for 10 weeks' work between 19 February 2024 and 30 April 2024, calculated at a rate of £1,500 per month (£346.15 per week).
The judgment is a short-form decision; written reasons were not provided and will only be issued on written request within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award of £3,461.54 is gross, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. Represents 10 weeks' wages (19 February 2024 – 30 April 2024) at £346.15 per week (£1,500 per month). | Upheld | — | £3,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.