Case 6006055/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Akpan v Lewisham E Foods Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006055/2024
- Decision date
- 23 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Curtis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Akpan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Curtis proceeded in the absence of the respondent under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, after correspondence had been sent to the respondent’s registered address and no response or participation had been received. The claimant, Mrs B Akpan, was represented in person. The tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and recorded the orders in writing.
The tribunal found that Lewisham E Foods Ltd was in breach of contract when it dismissed the claimant without notice. It awarded damages of £581.54, described as the gross sum due. The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant for work undertaken in April 2024, and ordered payment of £1,812, again stated to be the total gross sum due.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars required by s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, it made an additional award of 4 weeks’ pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002, in the sum of £2,325.36. The judgment therefore resulted in three monetary awards, with a combined total of £4,718.90.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by dismissing the claimant without notice and awarded damages of £581.54 gross. | Upheld | — | £582 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages because the claimant had not been paid for work undertaken in April 2024 and awarded £1,812 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,812 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a statement of employment particulars required by s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an additional award of 4 weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £2,325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,719
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.