Case 6006085/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jain v RegPak Biopharma Consulting — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006085/2025
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mrs Jain's claim for unlawful deduction of wages and/or breach of contract succeeded in relation to the respondent's failure to pay one week's notice pay.
RegPak Biopharma Consulting did not attend the hearing. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £500 net. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claim for unlawful deduction of wages and/or breach of contract in relation to 1 week's notice pay succeeds, but does not split the £500 award between claim labels. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claim for unlawful deduction of wages and/or breach of contract in relation to 1 week's notice pay succeeds, but does not split the £500 award between claim labels. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.