Case 6006123/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Christian Omereonye v Ventry Construction Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006123/2024
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Christian Omereonye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr Christian Omereonye's unfair dismissal complaint. The reason given was that he had not been employed by Ventry Construction Limited for a continuous period of two years before his dismissal, which meant the claim did not satisfy the qualifying service requirement in section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment also stated that, for the avoidance of doubt, the other complaints in the claim form were unaffected by this judgment. No findings were made in this decision on any of those other complaints, and no remedy was assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not been employed by the respondent for a continuous period of two years before dismissal, as required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.