Case 6006158/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Little v Paul kanwal. Kanwal UK industries limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006158/2025
- Decision date
- 8 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Little
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal had written to the claimant warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply.
Employment Judge Spencer was satisfied that the grounds for strike out applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The tribunal stated that the redundancy payment claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' continuous employment with the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was struck out under Rule 38 because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' continuous employment to qualify. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.