Case 6006205/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Tuplin v Booker Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006205/2024
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Tuplin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 15 May 2025 giving him until 29 May 2025 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The potential grounds identified were the manner in which proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant, non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 23 October 2024, lack of active pursuit, and reasons stated by the respondent in applying for an unless order. The claimant did not make written representations or ask for a hearing, and the respondent said it had still not heard from him.
The hearings fixed for 1 July 2025 and 16 to 24 March 2026 were cancelled as a result of the strike out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately analyse this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately analyse the disability discrimination allegation. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately analyse the unfair dismissal allegation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.