Case 6006211/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Roberts v Evolve Facility Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006211/2025
- Decision date
- 29 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Roberts brought claims against Evolve Facility Services Limited, heard by Employment Judge Barker at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 22 July 2025. The judgment records that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit.
The tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time, but it also found that they were not presented within a further reasonable period. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
No remedy was awarded. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text does not restate the underlying pleaded cause of action, but the case listing identifies the matter as a breach of contract claim. It was dismissed on limitation grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.