Case 6006214/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H McGarrity v Moston Consultants Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006214/2025
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Representation
- Venue
- Leeds ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H McGarrity
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Miss H McGarrity suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages from her final wages payment made on 30 November 2024. The judgment records that the hearing took place at Leeds ET by CVP on 26 June 2025 before Employment Judge Deeley, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its Finance Manager, Mrs D Swales.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the deduction claim was upheld. The Tribunal ordered Moston Consultants Ltd to pay the claimant £1,918.48 gross in respect of that deduction. No further written reasons were provided in the decision record, and no other claims, tests, or liability findings are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal declared that the claimant suffered an unauthorised deduction from her final wages payment on 30 November 2024 and ordered repayment of £1,918.48 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,918 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,918
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.